Showing posts with label Sherlock Holmes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sherlock Holmes. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 March 2021

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the Often Unenviable Fairy Seat


"A Dance around the Moon" by Charles Altamont Doyle

 I knew that the creator of Sherlock Holmes had believed in fairies, and was happy to pronounce Frances and Elsie's cardboard cut-outs below evidence of psychic phenomena, despite this seeming to go against every tenet of his creation's practice of deductive reasoning.
 
  But what I didn't know – which might go some way towards explaining this discrepancy – is how large a part fairies had played in the life of Arthur Conan Doyle's own father: the illustrator Charles Altamont Doyle. According to Alistair Kneal's Transceltic blog, "his paintings were often of fantasy scenes, many featuring fairies..."
 
 "Meditation, Self Portait" by Charles Altamont Doyle  
 
 However "after growing family worries about his moods and desperate attempts to obtain alcohol, he was admitted to the nursing home of Blairerno House at Drumlithie in the Mearns... Following an aggressive attempt to leave Blairerno House he was sent to Sunnyside, Montrose Royal Lunatic Asylum on 26 May 1885...


"The seat of fairies is not always enviable"
 
"It is described that he would tell staff that he was receiving messages from the unseen world and accused them of being devils... He maintained to his family that he was sane and had been wrongfully confined. In doing so he complied sketchbooks with caricatures, drawings of fairies and notes...
 
 Painting from "The Doyle Diary" 1889
 
"He inscribed the frontispiece of his sketchbook diary: ‘Keep steadily in view that this Book is ascribed wholly to the produce of a MADMAN. Whereabouts would you say was the deficiency of Intellect? or depraved taste? If in the whole book you can find a single evidence of either, mark it and record it against me.’"
 
 
 "The Spirits of the Prisoners" 1885
 
 There is more of his work on Monster Brains.

Sunday, 6 September 2020

Notebookery 8 (2014ish)


 This notebook might explain why the last one was so neglected. No page is blank, although none are so handsome as in the green book. Anything I worked on from 2014-ish onwards, I suppose, was worked on a little in this, including a theory I'd completely forgotten about, that Arthur Conan Doyle invented the language of cinema (I admit it's possible authors may have been pointing out what characters saw even before Sherlock Holmes.) There's also a little more Time Spanner material, a sketch for a Ulysses 31 knock-off comic that Martin Gay might have tried to sell in school (obviously based on Power Socket), and lines from later episodes that would never be said. All opinions are the characters' own. (Click to enlarge.)






Wednesday, 18 March 2020

Whither Wednesdays?


  As a final Frankenstein Wednesdays postlude, here is one of Bela Lugosi and Lon Chaney Junior's last appearances together (and Lugosi's frist appearance with Vampira, five years before Plan 9 For Outer Space) a shabby sketch show starring a shabby comedian sponsored by something called Geritol. I've only stuck it here to dispel the myth that Lugosi's one foray into live television was a total disaster, and that Red Skelton's improvisations caused him to jeopardise the show because as you can see, that's not what happens at all. Bela forgets a line, but that's it. It's fine. It's even charming. Live theatre was Bela's livelihood, and I know he looks shockingly ill, even standing next to Chaney who looks like Bill the Cat, but it still makes me happy to see him doing work this good with material this bad (including his own mortal tissue). It's nothing like the scene in Ed Wood, is what I am saying. The curtain's not brought down.

 I love this movie. But. 

 Moving on though: What am I going to do for Wednesdays now? I know I didn't aways make the deadlines, and that last Abbott and Costello post went on for eight days, so maybe I should give myself a break and not dedicate Wednesdays to anything for a while. But if I were to, here are some candidates...


 Clockwise, from top left:



 A box set of the first six Star Trek films: in which the original crew of the Enterprise grow old and realise they've nothing but each other. In trying to wring adventure out of Reason rather than Romance Trek's impact on popular science fiction, and by extension the popular subconscious, might be as deep as Frankenstein's. But do I really want to chunter on in that vein for six weeks? Conventional wisdom says the odd-numbered films are bad and the even-numbered ones are good, so at least I'd be kept on my toes. Or if I wanted to stay in the thirties...


 A box set of seventeen W. C Fields Features: I adore W.C. Fields, am always happy to recommend his work, and know there are at least five films in here I'd want to say something about. Also this would let me delve deeper into the thirties, nor do I remember any of them being stinkers. Still five out of seventeen's not a great ratio, and maybe I should be careful how much of the thirties I dabble in. There's always earlier...


 A box set of Early Hitchcock. Nine films, all British, some silent. There's a lot here I haven't seen, so that would be one reason to go for this. And I love Hitchcock's early British stuff. But maybe too niche. Maybe I could review some telly instead...


 A box set of the Bardathon. Clive James' name for the BBC's televising of every single play known to have been penned by Shakespeare at the time of broadcast, the early eighties. Thirty-nine plays, each about three hours long. So a hell of a project, but I have already watched them all, and enjoyed most of them. Then again, I'm an English graduate. Also I've no idea what these posts would look like. A bit curious to find out. Also piquing my curiosity...

 Twenty-two Ingmar Bergman films I inherited from my godfather. Again, a very heavy exercise. I've seen very little Bergman though, so like the Hitchcock this would be an excuse to finally watch something, rather than an opportunity for closer study. And Bergman definitely deserves closer study. And maybe now's not the time. Or maybe he's completely up my alley. I've no idea, this is the biggest blind spot on the current list. Unlike...


 The complete Ulysses 31. Space. Robots. God. Bad acting. Good design. Great music. Twenty-six episodes. Last-minute thought. I still haven't read the Odyssey. Back to the thirties...



 The Complete Thin Man Collection. William Powell and Myrna Loy get pissed and solve crimes in the thirties. Six films. I love the first two - maybe too much to have anything interesting to say about them - and I haven't seen the last four. Speaking of Powells...


 Two box sets of films by Powell and Pressburger. Some absoute wonders here, but I haven't seen them all, so again I'd be using this as an opportunity to cath up. A lot has already been written about the films I have seen though, and I'm not sure I'll be bringing much to this party. And finally...


The complete Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce Sherlock Holmes. Fourteen films, which I love, which is a reason for choosing them. Also I'm not sure I've seen them all, which is another reason for. Also there'll be some continuity of talent with Universal's Frankensteins, another reason for. But I might love every film for the same reason, and there's fourteen of them, so I might not have that much new to say about each. Then again, maybe "not that much" is eactly the right length for a blog.


 Okay, just searching for those screengrabs has made me keen to do definitely something. Feel free to make suggestions below.

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

Frankenstein Wednesdays: "Son of Frankenstein" (1939) – An Heir to the House of Fronkensteen!

 Continuing my weekly "But What Do I Know!" through Universal's first 8 Frankensteins...

  Boris! Basil! Um, Bela?!

 There are few scenes in Rowland V. Lee's Son of Frankenstein where one couldn't comfortably imagine the company bursting into laughter the second Lee shouted "Cut!" It is an extraordinarily happy film – extraordinary especially as one of its happiest elements is fallen star Bela Lugosi as a body-snatcher with a broken neck. Lugosi had just become a father, as had Karloff – seen here sharing a moment of swagger with Bela Junior:


  The story of the film's making is also, overall, a happy one. In 1936, Universal had resolved to stop making Horror following a British boycott of the genre (stupid bloody country), but this hiatus proved short-lived: in 1938, a nation-wide re-release of both Frankenstein and Dracula proved so popular that the studio immediately dug out the old tesla coils and machines that go BVURRRP, as well as Bela Lugosi, whose reputation and career had taken a horrific hit from '36. But, according his widow, Lillian Donlevy Lugosi:
"[The studio] cut Bela's salary from $1,000 per week to $500. Then they planned to shoot all his scenes in the picture in one week! When Rowland V. Lee heard about this, he said, and I quote, Those God-damned sons of bitches! I'll show them. I'm going to keep Bela on this picture from the first day of shooting right up to the last! And he did."
  He really did. There's barely a scene in the opening twenty minutes of this film where Lugosi isn't eavesdropping somewhere as "Ygor", his shaggy, snaggle-toothed head popping up from behind a rock, or broken window, for a day's pay – a good gig, especially as Ygor wasn't even in the first shooting script.


 But, boy, is he in the finished film! Not the scoliotic assistant from future spoofs, this Ygor-with-a-Y is a shunned criminal, who having survived hanging, is now something of an embarrassment to other Frankensteinians – Oh yes! It turns out "Frankenstein" is actually the name of the village. And Frankensteinians is what they call themselves! – As the real monster of this movie, Lugosi gives a revelatorily anarchic performance, a million miles from the Margaret-Dumontish aristocrats he'd played previously. There's something of the wicked witch about him too – children dare each other to approach his crooked house – and in his shrewd adoption of lowest possible status to avoid suspicion, there's also something of Columbo but if Columbo was the murderer (Ygor is using the Monster to kill off the jury who sent him to the gallows; that's the plot Lee manages to rustle up.)


 The face Ygor's coughing into above? Michael Mark! Maria's father in Frankenstein, but as I remarked last week, absent from its sequel Bride. And just off camera is Lionel Belmore, the Burgomaster from Frankenstein, also absent from Bride – both of the Monster's final victims exiles from the canon whom Rowland V. Lee has returned to the fold. See? Happy!


 Aw, and the mob's back too. But instead of torches, they now weild axes (which might be safer, who knows?) When we first meet them though, they're a sea of umbrellas, braving torrential rain to meet the late Doctor's American heir, Wolf (sic) von Frankenstein at the Bahnhof, only to then showily walk out on him. They're a miserable bunch of rock-throwers, and I'm not sure we're meant to mind when they're murdered. Obviously, Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein was influenced by this film, but there's a strong possibility Blazing Saddles might have been as well.


 And The Shining! Because, unlike Gene Wilder's Frederick, Basil Rathbone's Wolf brought his family along. As Elsa, Josephine Hutchinson's almost immediate disenchantment with the adventure her husband has undertaken is perhaps the saddest thing in the film. Not that you can blame her: Her relationship with Wolf is no more happily heteronormative than his parents'."If the house is filled with dread, place the beds at head to head..." is one Frankensteinian tradition. And their new home has neither the claustrophobic chintz of Frankenstein, nor the eccentric kitsch of Bride. It's just... well, this:

 And this:

 And this:

   Although some people might find that last view quite sexy. 
 It's nice, after the lever from nowhere that blew everything up in Bride, to have some foreshadowing: Oh okay, so that's how the monster's going to die.


  It's also nice to hear even Wolf acknowledge in this film that nine out of ten people now think "Frankenstein" is the name of the monster. Funny too. As he descends deeper into the sulphurous unniceties of his father's sexless work – literally trying to save his name – Elsa starts fearing for his sanity (and again, you can't blame her). Rathbone is a brilliant but not sympathetic actor: he's physiognomically incapable of looking anywhere other than down his own nose, and so the further he falls, the funnier it is to watch him imperiously try to maintain any semblance of dignity, and Rathbone's manic performance suggests he knows this.*

  Meanwhile! The Frankensteins' tiny son, Peter – in scenes we never see – has started happily communicating with the horrors in the walls: potentially terrifying, if everything young actor Donnie Dunagan did and said wasn't absolutely hilarious. I tragically can't find any audible footage of his performace online, but imagine Mr. Hanky the Christmas Poo, and here's a still image of the future voice of Bambi being restrained by Karloff's monster, menacing Lionel Atwill's Inspector Krogh with his own prosthetic arm.

  So it's that kind of a film: Huge fun, but also, you can understand why Karloff didn't return for a fourth. His creature is comatose for much of it – again, a good gig – and we are finally, three Frankenstein films in, presented with the semi-recumbent tableau so often recreated in comedy routines to come (although it's Frankenstein's bird-skeletoned butler Benson here who throws the switches, not Ygor):


 There is one superb, wordless sequence, three minutes long, when Frankenstein's two offspring – the Monster and Wolf – first face one another: Karloff's monster no longer talks. I'm fine with that. I'm fine in fact pretending, for the sake of this movie, Bride never happened. Some of what Karloff does – examining his brother's face, then his own reflection – has the poetry and clarity of his reaching up for the light back in 1931. But some of it is distressingly, if convincingly, unreadable. When he brings Wolf over to the mirror, what's he doing? Is he seeing if the mirror is lying? Is he performing an experiment? What's he asking for? I don't know. Nor does Wolf. So the monster gives up. And you can't blame him either. He is a stranger to us now.


  It's unusual to see our boy carry out the murders so slily. Making things look like an accident had never been his style. Oh well... one-armed Inspector Krogh is on the case – an almost Spielbergian portrait of dependability and genuine goodness from Lionel Atwill, and perhaps the most deadpan performance of the film. Krogh's dry tone serves not only the film's comedy though, but also its surprising celebration of humanity. Atwill brings no bitterness to the loss of his arm, just clarity. When he sticks darts in the wooden prosthetic, yes it's funny, but also, how else was he going to hold the darts? We may laugh, but we'll catch up with Krogh. 
 It's all good.


 Okay. I'll stop there. 
 The quote from Lugosi's widow comes from here, where you'll also find extracts from Willis Cooper's orginal Ygor-less shooting script. This lovely blog on "Son" also provided useful background, although, I'm generally not trying to write too much about artists' private lives here. But I like hearing people were happy.

 Next week, kids, it's 1942's "Ghost of Frankenstein". More Ygor!
 
* Rathbone embarked upon perhaps his most famous role, Sherlock Holmes, this same year, 1939. Nigel Bruce's Watson had to be a harmless buffoon for an audience to care what happened to either of them, and it was a perfect partnership. I sort of wish I was writing about those films from now on, rather than what's to come. Still...

Saturday, 3 June 2017

Me at the zoo

"And now, Watson, it only remains for us to find out by wire the identity of the cabman, No. 2704, and then we will drop into one of the Bond Street picture galleries and fill in the time until we are due at the hotel."
 One of the excellent things about reading Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes is how positively it affects your time-keeping: Holmes' energy is contagious, he clearly loves living in London and he knows how to use it – the city is his Bat-belt. I'm currently not in London, however. I'm in Frankfurt, playing an Obelicised Watson in a "Hound of the Baskervilles", and using neither the city nor my time here nearly as effectively as SH (I've been here a month so far. I've heard a lot of podcasts in bed). But now that we have a week off I thought I should mark it somehow, so I started reading the book, as I said, and it's clearly put some baking soda up my aft, because yesterday I actually went to the zoo.

It was terrifying.
 
 And I then I made my first film on a phone. And here it is. Good old blog. We must catch up. In the meantime, here is a sustained invasion of privacy:



 Yes. Something escaped.