You can leaf through the entire manuscript here. The writing is meaningless, and it's fair to say the pictures are as well, but pictures don't have to mean anything, so rather than being a "hoax" textbook as some have suggested, I prefer David Reed's "princess in a tower" theory, that this is simply the work of someone who "was illiterate, but had seen books, and was excited by them." I don't know if Luigi Serafini had ever seen the Voynich Manuscript, but a similar excitement seems to have inspired the Italian architects's Codex Seraphinianus...
Serafini said himself that "he wanted his alphabet to convey the sensation that
children feel in front of books they cannot yet understand", and like the writing in the Voynich Manuscript it is asemic, a word I've just learned. This hasn't stopped people trying to "decode" the book's "secrets" ever since its publication in 1981, but the only difference I can see between the impeti behind the Codex Seraphinianus and the Voynich Manuscript is that Serafini's book was definitely meant for public consumption.
Maybe we should all be taking this time under lockdown to work on our own asemic codices, now that we're all princess in a tower. Nothing too big to start with. Only yesterday I learnt from The Wellcome Collection of all places, how to make an eight-page "zine" out of a single piece of paper:
Is this new learning? Certainly I was never taught it in all my childhood of making half-finished comic books! Oh well, here's episode 2 - Court-blaming, comet-shaming, and not getting the angel:
This is not asemic. It is the cross-section of a Kaiju.
Maybe we should all be taking this time under lockdown to work on our own asemic codices, now that we're all princess in a tower. Nothing too big to start with. Only yesterday I learnt from The Wellcome Collection of all places, how to make an eight-page "zine" out of a single piece of paper:
I've been trying to find the article I came across some time ago about a similar manuscript (might have been the same one, even) but no such luck this far. I was nonetheless very pleased to find out that two alternative candidates proposed as possible authors of the Voynich manuscript are none other than John Dee and his partner-in-scrying (and wife-swapping) Edward Kelley. From a purely aesthetic perspective, I happen to find the writing used in that manuscript particularly pleasing to the eye, as opposed to the elaborate intricacies of the Codex Seraphinianus. (I applaud both authors' creativity and perseverance, anyway - especially if the princess in a tower theory does indeed apply in both cases.)
ReplyDeleteAs for Defoe's Journal, I have to say I almost regret we (mainly) stopped blaming sudden epidemic outbreaks on celestial objects or angelic apparitions - only to start doing that exact same thing with their modern equivalents. Nothing new under the sun, and so on and so forth. On a completely unrelated note, Comet ATLAS C/2019 Y4 might soon turn visible to the naked eye. Exciting times indeed.
I didn't know any of this! Outstanding. Thanks.
ReplyDelete